“Section 230” : Facebook CEO is open to Changes to platform-regulatory

Must read

Jeff Horseman
Jeff Horseman got into journalism because he liked to write and stunk at math. He grew up in Vermont and he honed his interviewing skills as a supermarket cashier by asking Bernie Sanders “Paper or plastic?” After graduating from Syracuse University in 1999, Jeff began his journalistic odyssey at The Watertown Daily Times in upstate New York, where he impressed then-U.S. Senate candidate Hillary Clinton so much she called him “John” at the end of an interview. From there, he went to Annapolis, Maryland, where he covered city, county and state government at The Capital newspaper. Today, Jeff writes about anything and everything. Along the way, Jeff has covered wildfires, a tropical storm, 9/11 and the Dec. 2 terror attack in San Bernardino. If you have a question or story idea about politics or the inner workings of government, please let Jeff know. He’ll do his best to answer, even if it involves a little math.

“Section 230”
Facebook CEO is open to Changes to platform-regulatory

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Photo: Kay Nietfeld/dpa

© dpa-infocom GmbH

A law from the 90s granted platforms such as Facebook a certain amount of security and the freedom to block individual posts. That brought US President, Trump repeated on the palm. It needs to be repaired?

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has shown itself to be open to Changes to a US scheme, which is a cornerstone for the functioning of all major Online platforms.

The so-called “Section 230” of a law from the 90s stating that services such as Facebook and Twitter are not made for content liable to their users online. On the other, they are the platforms of far-reaching freedom, against individual contributions to proceed. Especially, US President, Donald Trump is attacking the rule.

Zuckerberg said in a hearing in the U.S. Senate on Wednesday, “the Congress should update the law to ensure that it works as intended”. Among other things, Facebook for more transparency around individual decisions. At the same time, Zuckerberg defended the scheme in principle: “Without the “Section 230″ might be made the platforms are responsible for everything, what people say online.”

Trump had called for repeatedly in recent months, the “Section 230” to abolish. His government took the first steps, with the aim of the game room for the procedure against individual contributions limit. Trump and the Republicans accuse the Online service to censor conservative voices and contributions of the President.

The Republicans in the trade Committee of the Senate, used the hearing a few days before the U.S. presidential election, to take Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Google Executive Sundar Pichai in the defect. They directed their attacks mainly on Dorsey, after Twitter had provided in the past months, again and again, Tweets from Trump with misleading or false information to the Coronavirus, as well as to the US election with warnings.

dpa

Latest article

More articles