Recent Multichain Exploit Linked to Internal Rug Pull by Chainalysis

Must read

Jeff Horseman
Jeff Horseman
Jeff Horseman got into journalism because he liked to write and stunk at math. He grew up in Vermont and he honed his interviewing skills as a supermarket cashier by asking Bernie Sanders “Paper or plastic?” After graduating from Syracuse University in 1999, Jeff began his journalistic odyssey at The Watertown Daily Times in upstate New York, where he impressed then-U.S. Senate candidate Hillary Clinton so much she called him “John” at the end of an interview. From there, he went to Annapolis, Maryland, where he covered city, county and state government at The Capital newspaper. Today, Jeff writes about anything and everything. Along the way, Jeff has covered wildfires, a tropical storm, 9/11 and the Dec. 2 terror attack in San Bernardino. If you have a question or story idea about politics or the inner workings of government, please let Jeff know. He’ll do his best to answer, even if it involves a little math.

Recent Multichain Exploit Linked to Internal Rug Pull by Chainalysis

  • Smart contracts on Multichain are executed using a multiparty computation mechanism.
  • Chainalysis speculated that the attacker may have compromised Multichain’s MPC keys.

According to Chainalysis, a blockchain security and analytics company, the exploit of the cross-chain bridge technology Multichain that cost millions of dollars may have been an internal rug pull.

The firm stated:

“On July 6, 2023, cross-chain bridge protocol Multichain experienced unusually large, unauthorized withdrawals in what appears to be a hack or rug pull by insiders.”

Over $125 million has been lost as a direct consequence of the exploit. However, according to Chainalysis, the attack might have been the consequence of stolen administrator keys, suggesting it was an “inside job.”

Internal Issues

Smart contracts on Multichain are executed using a multiparty computation (MPC) mechanism, which the company likened to a multisignature wallet.

Chainalysis speculated that the attacker may have compromised Multichain’s MPC keys in order to launch the vulnerability. According to Chainalysis, the most glaring manifestation of these internal problems was the disappearance of Multichain’s CEO, “Zhaojun,” in late May.

Binance discontinued support for some of its bridging tokens on July 7 because of delayed transactions and other technical issues. Meanwhile, recently, numerous fictitious transactions involving Multichain tokens have been detected by blockchain detectives.

One source of the irregular outflows was the Multichain executor address, which drained token addresses from many chains. On July 8, Circle and Tether, two stablecoin issuers, froze roughly $65 million in funds related to the Multichain attack.

Knowledge graph protocol 0xScope reports that at least $63.2 million USDC was sent to three addresses before being frozen. According to another report by the Fantom Foundation, Etherscan froze over $2.5 million in Tether USDT from two addresses labeled “Multichain Suspicious Addresses.”

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Robert Kiyosaki Predicts Bitcoin To Reach $120,000 by 2024

Latest article

More articles